Book Chapter
| 2015
Towards a framework for impact assessment
Bridging the literatures on peacebuilding and transitional justice, this chapter outlines an analytical framework for assessing the impact of transitional justice mechanisms on peace and democracy. The multilayered qualitative framework stresses the importance of national, regional, and global contexts in framing transitional justice processes. To avoid the shortcomings of single-case studies and statistical analysis, we propose an intermediate approach to impact assessment by using a structured comparison of a small number of post-conflict and post-authoritarian cases.
- Rights and Legal Institutions
- Peru
- Rwanda
- Angola
- Transitional justice
- Democracy
- Peace
- Human rights violations
- Accountability
- Conflict
- Post-authoritarian
- Post-conflict
Appears in:
After Violence: Transitional Justice, Peace, and Democracy
Skaar, Elin, Camila Gianella, and Trine Eide
Also in this volume:
- Transitional justice alternatives: claims and counterclaims
Skaar, Elin and Camila Gianella Malca - Uruguay: reconstructing peace and democracy through transitional justice
Skaar, Elin - Peru: changing contexts for transitional justice
Gianella, Camila - Rwanda: some peace, no democracy, and the complex role of transitional justice
Eide, Trine, Astri Suhrke - Angola: negative peace and autocracy in the shadow of impunity
Malca, Camila Gianella and Elin Skaar - Conclusions
Skaar, Elin, Camila Gianella, and Trine Eide