Corruption and REDD+: Identifying risks amid complexity

André Standing

Pdf
Projects
Cite
Share

How to cite this publication:

André Standing (2012). Corruption and REDD+: Identifying risks amid complexity. Bergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute (U4 Brief 2012:2)

French version: Corruption et REDD+ : Identifier les risques dans une situation complexe

Corruption and other factors can influence deforestation in contradictory ways. For the purpose of country-level implementation of REDD+, donors should focus particularly on three corruption risk areas: land grabbing and tenure rights, fraud in monitoring, evaluation and reporting, and elite capture of REDD+ revenues.

U4 Theme:

See the theme pages on the U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre.

Corruption and REDD+: Identifying risks amid complexity

U4 Theme:

See also:

Les risques et stratégies de réduction de la corruption dans la mise en œuvre de REDD+ en République Démocratique du Congo: un aperçu de la situation actuelle

Corruption risks and experiences in REDD+ financial benefit sharing mechanisms

The political economy of corruption and REDD+: Lessons from the Philippines’ pilot sites

The political economy of REDD+ in Kenya: Identifying and responding to corruption challenges

Prabowos seier: Går Indonesia inn i en ny strongman-era ?

Struggling to put on the integrity jacket: Anti-corruption commitments beyond 2024

Verden går til valg

Displaying Demons: Processions at the Crossroads in Multi-religious Indonesia

Migration drivers across time and space: selected examples

Social and Spatial Flood Risk Analysis for Decision Making: Cases from Two Flood Prone Areas in Eastern Sudan

Crushing Hamas? Origins and Expansion of the Islamic Resistance Movement in Lebanon

“Too Much” Sand, Not Water: A Geostory of Himalayan Riverine Sediments as “Problem”