The Paradox of Representation in Sudan: Muslim Women's Diverging Agendas

Liv Tønnessen; Hilde Granås Kjøstvedt

Pdf
Author
Project
Cite
Share

How to cite this publication:

Liv Tønnessen, Hilde Granås Kjøstvedt (2010). The Paradox of Representation in Sudan: Muslim Women's Diverging Agendas. Bergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute (CMI Brief 1)

The international discourse on gender and peacebuilding presupposes a common agenda among all women across religion, ethnicity and class in any given post-confl ict situation. This brief challenges this position by exploring the attitudes and priorities of Muslim female activists in Sudan. Disunited and politicized, they have multiple and competing priorities rather than a common gender-based agenda.

Liv Tønnessen

Director of Center on Law and Social Transformation and Senior Researcher

Women and Peacebuilding in Sudan

Apr 2009 - Nov 2009

The Paradox of Representation in Sudan: Muslim Women's Diverging Agendas

Liv Tønnessen

Women and Peacebuilding in Sudan

See also:

Scared, but still trying: stories of women activists working for peace in conflict areas in Sudan

When Refuge is Home: Sudan’s war-affected IDPs in Gedarif State, Eastern Sudan

Social and Spatial Flood Risk Analysis for Decision Making: Cases from Two Flood Prone Areas in Eastern Sudan

Unifying Sudan’s youth movements: A path towards peace

Education desires and conflict impacts in refugees’ decisions to leave

Externally Driven Border Control in West Africa: Local Impact and Broader Ramifications

Reinforcing or obscuring refugee rights? The roles of vulnerability in Norwegian asylum practices

Abortion Within Reason or Right: Navigating Reproductive Governance and Abortion Stigma in Madagascar's Urban Central Highlands